Survey Says: You don’t have a Strategy Problem. You Have an Execution Problem.

  • It requires a management system that makes strategy visible, measurable, aligned, accountable, and adaptable.”

Key Findings

We’ll spare you the detailed response data, but to summarize, the results indicate that many responding organizations do not deploy their strategic objectives with enough clarity to guide employees’ day-to-day decisions. Employees often lack a clear understanding of leadership’s strategic intent, the most important priorities for their work focus, and clarity in the outcomes they are expected to deliver. 

The execution gap is even more pronounced. Even when companies successfully deploy strategic objectives, many do not monitor team progress against those objectives consistently. Fewer still intervene quickly and effectively when projects, teams, or initiatives begin to deviate from desired outcomes. 

Without this connection, strategy remains a leadership artifact rather than an operating system for the organization. 

Why the Gap Persists 

The poor track record of strategy realization is well documented: many strategic initiatives fail, and many companies do not fully realize their stated strategic objectives. The survey results suggest that these failures are not caused by misguided objectives or insufficient ambition as much as poorly developed foundational strategy capabilities. More often, failure to realize strategy reflects breakdowns in the foundational practices required to translate strategy into day-to-day action. 

What the Survey Questions Reveal 

  • Strategy Articulation
    Several questions explored whether strategy is defined and articulated in a way that can guide behavior, including whether objectives are clearly defined, actionable, and supported by empirical measures. This is the right starting point. Strategy execution requires clarity about the desired end state, credible measures of progress, and enough specificity for teams to understand how their work contributes to enterprise outcomes.
  • Strategy Deployment
    Other questions examined strategy deployment: whether employees understand the most important priorities they should focus on each day and whether those priorities connect to broader strategic objectives. Without this connection, strategy remains a leadership artifact rather than an operating system for the organization. 
  • Alignment
    The survey also tested alignment, including whether objectives at every level align with overall corporate strategy and whether departments and functions are aligned with one another. This distinction matters. Many organizations, including those that have adopted OKRs, still rely heavily on top-down goal setting while underinvesting in horizontal alignment across teams, functions, and value streams. 
  • Execution Capability
    Execution capability was assessed through questions about active performance tracking, corrective action during the quarter, role clarity, and leadership accountability. Effective strategy realization depends on these practices. Senior executives must be accountable not only for setting strategy, but also for ensuring that the organization has defined processes, accountable owners, and timely feedback loops for deployment and execution. 
  • Strategic Adaptability
    Finally, the survey addressed strategic adaptability: the organization’s ability to sense opportunities and threats, adjust strategic objectives, and see those adjustments reflected in employee behavior and investment decisions. Adaptability is not a standalone capability. It builds upon the foundations of strategic clarity, alignment, execution tracking, and accountability. 

Root Causes Behind the Symptoms 

  • Lack of leadership accountability and engagement for strategy realization
  •  Ineffective processes for deploying strategic objectives across the organization
  • Poor alignment between silos; leaders optimizing locally for parochial rather than enterprise goals
  • Objectives that are set but not actively tracked, managed, or adjusted during execution
  • Slow, painful adaptation of strategic objectives lagging changing competitive and market conditions  

The framework matters, but it cannot compensate for missing fundamentals.

Evan Campbell - Book Title: Adapt to Win: A Framework to Overcome Strategy Decay using OKRs and Lean Portfolio Management - published by Wiley. Displays a photo of Evan smiling and looking to the side and a cover of the book.
Go Deeper on Strategy Execution

Explore the practices that help organizations realize strategic objectives and build strategic adaptability by reading Adapt to Win: A Framework to Overcome Strategy Decay Using OKRs and Lean Portfolio Management by Evan Campbell.